Previous page Next page

Fujifilm X10 Hands-on Preview

October 2011 | Richard Butler


Preview based on a production X10 with firmware 1.0

The revival of the enthusiast camera sector over the past few years has been a surprising but welcome development in the industry. The widespread acclaim for the Panasonic LX3 has encouraged other manufacturers to join or re-enter the fray with high-end offerings of their own, resulting in excellent, high-spec cameras such as the Samsung TL500, Olympus XZ-1 and Canon S95.

Now it's time for Fujifilm to play its hand, which it has done with its X10. Conceptually it borrows our favorite features from the two distinct sub-types that have emerged in this category - it takes the fast lens from cameras such as the TL500 and XZ-1 and combines it with the optical viewfinder and extensive controls of the Canon G12 and Nikon P7100. Just to finish things off, Fujifilm wraps the whole thing in magnesium alloy bodywork that evokes its big brother, the X100 and the 1960's rangefinders it borrowed its styling from.

The X10's innards are as progressive as its exterior is staid. It features a 12MP, '2/3" type' sensor, which means it's between 26% and 40% larger than the sensors used by its enthusiast compact peers and twice as large as those used in almost all regular compacts. It also uses the company's unique 'EXR' technology that makes it easy to combine pairs of pixels to produce 6MP images that have either been averaged to reduce noise or differently exposed so that more highlight information is captured. The underlying chip uses conventional CMOS arrangement, rather than the back-side illuminated type that can help improve light capture in small sensors.

Bright manual zoom lens

Despite the larger sensor, Fujifilm manages to find room for an image-stabilized, retracting 28-112mm equivalent F2.0-2.8 lens. The wide aperture, combined with large sensor means not only does the X10 offer more control over depth-of-field than any other camera in its class, it also allows for shallower depth of field than most DSLRs when used with their kit zooms, when each are set to their respective telephoto ends.

The lens is manually zoomed, more like those on interchangeable lens cameras and this movement is mechanically linked to an optical viewfinder, meaning you drive the viewfinder as you extend the lens. The mechanically-driven lens and viewfinder design has two key advantages. The first is that it gives a pleasantly direct feeling of control over the lens' behavior, allowing continuous (rather than stepped) zooming. Crucially it also means the camera isn't dependent on its battery for driving the lens and viewfinder. The X10's rather small battery is rated at 270 shots per charge - which would be considerably lower if it also had more motors to drive.

The fast readout from the CMOS sensor allows the camera to shoot at up to 7 frames-per-second at full resolution and 10fps at 6MP. It also enables 1080p30 movie shooting and the creation of panoramas in a single sweep of the camera.

As befits a camera in this class, the X10 can capture Raw images and, in an welcome addition, it can also re-process its own Raw files in-camera (the Olympus XZ-1 is the only other camera in this class we can think of that can do this). Combine this feature with the X10's film simulation modes and color-filtered mono modes and it can be really useful for getting the best of the photos after shooting.

Fujifilm X10 specification highlights

  • 12MP EXR CMOS sensor
  • 28-112mm F2.0-2.8 lens
  • Optical viewfinder (85% coverage)
  • 2.8", 460,000 dot LCD
  • Extensive manual control
  • Raw shooting and in-camera Raw conversion
  • Continuous shooting up to 7fps at full resolution (10fps at 6MP)

Compared to the Olympus XZ-1

The Fujifilm X10 essentially brings together all the best features of its rivals - a very bright, reasonably lengthy zoom and a high quality glass viewfinder (they're usually plastic in compact cameras). Add to this its larger, EXR sensor and it's amazing the camera isn't much bigger than its peers. Understandably, it is rather more expensive (its launch price was 20% above that of the XZ-1).

The Olympus XZ-1 has the brightest zoom of any current compact camera, but the larger sensor (and hence longer focal lengths), mean the X10 offers fractionally more control over depth-of-field than the Olympus. Despite this, it's not a much larger camera.
Its bright lens also means that the X10 can give more-blurred backgrounds than a DSLR or large-sensor mirrorless camera with a typical kit zoom (i.e. 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 or 14-42mm F3.5-5.6), which is useful for subject isolation when shooting portraits.
The X10 is a touch larger than the PEN Mini but it also offers more in the way of direct control. It also contracts to a smaller size than the Mini, despite the Olympus retractable kit zoom and offers greater control over depth-of-field.


If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

Images which can be viewed at a larger size have a small magnifying glass icon in the bottom right corner of the image, clicking on the image will display a larger (typically VGA) image in a new window.

To navigate the review simply use the next / previous page buttons, to jump to a particular section either pick the section from the drop down or select it from the navigation bar at the top.

DPReview calibrate their monitors using Color Vision OptiCal at the (fairly well accepted) PC normal gamma 2.2, this means that on our monitors we can make out the difference between all of the (computer generated) grayscale blocks below. We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X,Y and Z and ideally A,B and C.

This article is Copyright 2011 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page
Share:

Comments

Total comments: 371
123
Tonys Camera Reviews
By Tonys Camera Reviews (Feb 18, 2012 at 00:53:53 GMT)

I agree with most of the comments. The writers of the Manual seem to have had some sort of aberration whilst compiling the Manual. I thought it was just old age creeping up on me but reading the comments has restored my faith in human beings. Anyone writing a small book explaining all the mysteries of the system is assured of great esteem and the publisher of great wealth from sales. So far nothing has appeared but I hope Magic Lantern Guides and others are hard at work unraveling the problems. Fantastic little Camera and the best thing I have come across since selling up my Linhof gear.

0 upvotes
micsch
By micsch (Feb 17, 2012 at 06:58:16 GMT)

Does anybody now, when the review will be available?

0 upvotes
intruder61
By intruder61 (Feb 20, 2012 at 00:51:08 GMT)

probably never, Fuji may have DPR by the short and curlys :)

0 upvotes
geopatriot
By geopatriot (Feb 15, 2012 at 12:16:19 GMT)

I've posted elsewhere about the frustrating autofocus, but I'd like to add my voice to the lousy battery performance. When I decided to go for the x10, I already planned to purchase two extra batteries. That seems to be the right number for me with other cameras. I travel overseas a lot and don't want to ever miss an opportunity to shoot because I don't have a spare ready to go. But, I was disappointed to find that i could only get ~150 shots on one go during a recent trip to Kuala Lumpur. And keep in mind that I didn't use the flash and typically don't spend a lot of time looking at my shots on the little monitor. To make things worse, Fuji doesn't have very good distribution on spare batteries. I scouted all of the major electronic malls over several days in KL before I finally found one shop that had a few to sell.

0 upvotes
JMHennig
By JMHennig (Feb 13, 2012 at 21:07:19 GMT)

Love the newest firmware update (1.03) fixes the "sticky ISO" settings.

Wish they would make the manual Zoom button (AEL/AFL) programmable also (or instead of) the RAW button though. All in all great cam in between my iPhone and DSLR.

0 upvotes
Realfi
By Realfi (Feb 13, 2012 at 05:52:28 GMT)

Review? Please?!

0 upvotes
JMHennig
By JMHennig (Feb 12, 2012 at 19:38:42 GMT)

Please Apple...need RAW support in Aperture for the X10 already!

0 upvotes
Digitall
By Digitall (Feb 9, 2012 at 22:27:28 GMT)

For when a complete review to X-10, now that the new firmware was updateted?

0 upvotes
tenbuckalley
By tenbuckalley (Feb 9, 2012 at 06:07:05 GMT)

Just put a good example of the X10 HD Video on you tube.

http://youtu.be/xMsPJReGmuw

worth a look.

www.crossfirephotography.com

1 upvote
ianruiz
By ianruiz (Jan 31, 2012 at 22:44:57 GMT)

I am getting the Fujifilm X10 next week. Really excited!

0 upvotes
realsand
By realsand (Jan 25, 2012 at 06:29:24 GMT)

Looks nice, but there are clickings heard from the Auto Focusing (I presume) in the videos people have put up on Youtube for example..

0 upvotes
WillemVO
By WillemVO (Jan 17, 2012 at 20:45:06 GMT)

Own a X10 since about a month now. Excellent allround apart from a few excentricities. Just did an extensive series (a "making off") in indoor low light. Excellent results keeping ISO at 800. Amazing performance of EXR mode in those circumstances. Virtually no colour noise and luminance noise almost like grain; not unpleasant at all and no visible loss of sharpness. Clearly remarkable dynamic range. But in normal lighting circumstances I do prefer "old fashioned" A setting.
BUT WHEN IS DPREVIEW COMING WITH ITS IN DEPTH REVIEW ??? Was announced for the first days of this months ! Is there a problem ?

0 upvotes
TakePictures
By TakePictures (Jan 25, 2012 at 08:46:28 GMT)

They might be waiting for the new firmware before they start testing...

1 upvote
photgraphersmate
By photgraphersmate (Jan 12, 2012 at 21:35:43 GMT)

Bought one of these and had problems with autofocusing. Emailed Fuji and after 10 days and an acknowledgement saying they received my email still no reply to my query. What does that say about Fuji and its customer support (or lack of it)? However good the camera is (or isn't) if Fuji has no interest in effectively supporting it they shouldn't be surprised if customers abandon ship.

Comment edited 49 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
FraserTK
By FraserTK (Jan 11, 2012 at 01:37:10 GMT)

Another factor which I feel needs to be noted is the very limited continuous frames shooting, once again to deal with a timed exposure. I was expecting to be able to to use the multi frames to take an animation of clouds / storms / stars etc... but sadly multi frame has a limited shutter speed of a max of 4/100 of a second, so not much good in low light or when you want to use a ND filter and take a 1 second during the day another limitation even if you were to put up with the shutter speed issue is the fact the battery has an incredibly short life, even when you turn the screen/focus/IS off
Very much looking forward to the x pro

0 upvotes
FraserTK
By FraserTK (Jan 11, 2012 at 01:26:51 GMT)

If your expecting to be able to take a photo with this camera at night, you may be very disappointed. When you read the spec's this camera has a nice 30 second exposure, F/2 aperture, ISO 6400+, which is more than enough. All great until you realize you can only take a 30 second exposure on ISO 100, anything higher and the shutter speed is limited ISO 200 ~ 15 seconds, ISO 400 ~ 8 seconds, etc... Currently there is no notice about this - and I feel the camera is misrepresented. Great during the day thou.

1 upvote
Christian Chambon
By Christian Chambon (Jan 11, 2012 at 08:33:48 GMT)

Thanks for your reply.

I've read that there's a lot of undocumented limitations with this camera and I'm still wondering wich one would be the best to carry always with me with some manual possibilities (and a viewfinder)... Maybe the XZ1 with its EVF but what about in low light....

0 upvotes
FraserTK
By FraserTK (Jan 11, 2012 at 23:36:08 GMT)

During the day and in low light (apart from a timed exposure with a high ISO) this camera is great - fun to use and has the manual controls needed to be creative. The f/2 lens is quite impressive and the image quality is great. I love to take time-lapse animations, so I brought this camera to take snapshots when I'm walking up a mountain or when the bigger cameras are taking there sequences

0 upvotes
Christian Chambon
By Christian Chambon (Jan 12, 2012 at 19:32:34 GMT)

I think I'm gone to buy the X10 at the end of this week or next week. But I tought that Dpreview would finish the review shortly but it doesn't seems...

0 upvotes
Christian Chambon
By Christian Chambon (Jan 13, 2012 at 21:35:48 GMT)

Done... Let's wait next week to try...
I'll let you know.

0 upvotes
JMHennig
By JMHennig (Feb 10, 2012 at 22:46:43 GMT)

Can't agree more...love the camera, which looks nearly perfect on paper, but this definitely impacts long exposure in a negative way.

0 upvotes
Christian Chambon
By Christian Chambon (Jan 5, 2012 at 19:20:53 GMT)

I'm very interested by this camera as an everyday's one, always with me. My 500D is too large and I can't take with me all the lens...
I've read on the net a lot of pros and cons and I'm afraid of being disapointed compared to the quality of the 500d (even if I'm ok it can't be as good as...)....

So I'm waiting for the review... Will it be long ?

Thanks for your works !

0 upvotes
FraserTK
By FraserTK (Jan 11, 2012 at 01:40:20 GMT)

during the day, this is a great wee camera that will save you a lot of wait, on raw the photos are great, and you have good manual control if needed. The only thing during the day might be the battery life, but spares are quite cheep

0 upvotes
daza
By daza (Jan 19, 2012 at 21:15:00 GMT)

I do have both canon 500d and fuji x10, and i can tell you that the fuji x10 is as good or even better than the 500d in good liaght situations.

0 upvotes
WillemVO
By WillemVO (Jan 4, 2012 at 12:13:01 GMT)

Remarkable results using Raw and Lightroom. After having tested, and apart from ease of use for some, I don't see much interest in EXR mode and none in Scene modes. Also WB while shooting with flash (internal or external) is not perfect (though easily adjustable in Lightroom). DR adjustment works wonderfully well (I put it under the Fn button). Manual focus not very useable. Optical viewfinder OK, but not remarkable. Miss focus rectangle (I use AF-S centrum focus).

0 upvotes
Workless
By Workless (Jan 17, 2012 at 06:44:15 GMT)

I'm not an expert but I think I might know why the optical viewfinder does not have a focus rectangle, or any kind of cross hair guide. For my X10 at least, the viewfinder is way off-center compared to the actual image taken. In fact the rectangular area covered by the view finder (85%) is in the top left corner of the actual photographed image. If the viewfinder had a center guide it would have to be towards in the bottom right of the viewfinder. Has my camera got a defect or is this a normal feature of these "rangefinder" viewfinders?

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 15 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
sherwoodpete
By sherwoodpete (Feb 4, 2012 at 14:00:29 GMT)

"viewfinder is way off-center" - that's normal, it has a name, "parallax", and varies with subject distance.

For distant subjects it there should be no error, but for close-ups the error gradually gets more significant.

That's why either a DSLR or electronic viewfinder may be preferred - zero parallax error for those.

Comment edited 32 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
lindner
By lindner (Jan 2, 2012 at 15:17:28 GMT)

This camera has been in the shops for a while now, still only a 'preview' on the site. I would prefer for dpreview to dump any 'early preview privileges' by camera vendors and just post proper reviews as soon as possible once the cameras are out.

0 upvotes
PabloF
By PabloF (Jan 1, 2012 at 10:44:04 GMT)

DPReview staff: thanks for these samples. Are the full resolution (12MP) images in-camera jpg's or are they recorded in RAW and converted to jpg with an external SW?
I have had a X-10 for a few days and I have noticed what appear to be demosaicing artefacts on the full resolution jpg's produced in-camera, which disappear when recording in RAW and converting with external software. I don't see these artefacts on your full resolution samples and hence the question. I am wondering if the artefacts are a problem with my camera or a characteristic of the X-10's full resolution jpgs.
See this thread:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1012&message=40196201
Any feedback most welcome. Regards

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 6 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
goodlife67
By goodlife67 (Jan 1, 2012 at 05:11:00 GMT)

Need a little help...
Looks like this has a 28.4mm lens. Any focal length beyond that is created by optical zoom, correct? Thus, we are actually getting a cropped 28.4mm image with an angle of view that depends upon the focal length used.
Secondly, I read a few comments about DOF that has me wondering a little about expectations. I've yet to use this camera, but based upon the sample images I've seen, it seems like decent shallow DOF in the right circumstances--namely considerable distance between the subject and background and/or camera-to-subject distance. Of course, those factors apply to any camera/lens, but I tend to think this camera gives reasonable results. After all, we are not purchasing a Noctolux...
Thank you, everyone, for providing helpful thoughts. Can't wait for mine to arrive in a few weeks.

0 upvotes
goodlife67
By goodlife67 (Jan 1, 2012 at 05:39:13 GMT)

I just realized I was confused by digital vs. optical zoom. It appears maybe the lens is approximately a 28-112mm, with a 2x digital zoom. But if it has a 2x digital zoom, does that mean it will digitally zoom/crop to 224mm? I haven't seen anything written about that, so I'm guessing I've misunderstood something else...

0 upvotes
Revenant
By Revenant (Jan 8, 2012 at 20:27:55 GMT)

You haven't misunderstood anything about the zoom. 4x optical zoom (28-112 mm), and with 2x digital zoom you're able to reach 224 mm, or, to be exact, get an equivalent angle of view by cropping and enlarging a portion of the image, with (a slight) loss of image quality as a result.

0 upvotes
stproducer
By stproducer (Dec 30, 2011 at 00:22:54 GMT)

Truly dreadful video in an otherwise lovely camera. The inability to refocus during a clip by half punching the shutter is a killer, especially since the continuous focus mode (the only other idea focussing mode available) hunts like a maniac. Also no control of aperture or shutter speed.

Fuji please fix the firmware or stop touting the X10's 1080p abilities.

1 upvote
Marc PoKempner
By Marc PoKempner (Dec 29, 2011 at 17:47:47 GMT)

Either the G12 or the Nikon P7100 offer great control and options (articulated screens, raw files at any ISO) for 1/3 less cost - and with higher absolute quality - judging by the samples now available). The main advantage of the X10 seems to be it's very fast lens - but with less reach than the others. We're all eagerly awaiting the DP full review on the X10, or at least some samples that really show it's low light performance. Isn't there anyone on the testing staff that shoots at night?? Nightclubs, dancers, even available light portraits - SOMEthing that those of us who shoot low light situations can use to evaluate performance?
Klein's advice is also great -- "hand feel" is crucial and individual for those who actually work with a camera for extended periods. Smaller cameras (S95/ S100) are harder to hold still, and have no way to trigger external flash.

Comment edited 5 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
proxy
By proxy (Jan 12, 2012 at 11:13:48 GMT)

X10 low light test here:
http://www.focus-numerique.com/test-1329/compact-fujifilm-x10-bruit-electronique-12.html
and imaging-resource.com comparometer (test pics can be compared against most digital cameras)

0 upvotes
Stargazy
By Stargazy (Feb 6, 2012 at 22:28:00 GMT)

"Hand feel" is very important to me as well. I own a Pentax K-5 and am yearning for a NEX-7 (both great cameras to hold). The X10 sounds tempting for its features as well as its price. Would like to hear impressions of the X10's "hand feel". Thanks.

0 upvotes
amateur83
By amateur83 (Dec 28, 2011 at 16:17:35 GMT)

I am seeking advice...I am torn between the Canon G12 and this new X10. I am by no means a photographer but would like to tap into my creative side with photography. Never used anything other than your basic consumer digital camera and would like to invest in a higher quality camera. Can the professionals offer some advice, differences, opinions please :)

0 upvotes
nstilwell
By nstilwell (Dec 28, 2011 at 19:36:00 GMT)

I have the exact same question as above...but I will add the Canon S100 to the list. Trying to decide between the S100, G12, and Fuji X10.

0 upvotes
Rob Klein
By Rob Klein (Dec 29, 2011 at 16:05:28 GMT)

I now own an X10 and have shot with the G12 and the G9. The X10 has a fun quotient that the other two do not have. Does it have quirks, YES, but they are certainly outweighed by the low light capability and the general quality of the jpegs. No camera is perfect. Try the G12 in your hand and shoot with it and then do the same for the X10. That would be the best test.

1 upvote
tinpusher
By tinpusher (Dec 27, 2011 at 15:35:17 GMT)

I love the camera but worth remembering that any advantages of the EXR sensor come at the expense of resolution even in Non-EXR mode.
So you get great colour , low noise and decent DR but not the detail found in an image from an LX5 or G12.
I'm learning to live with that although sometimes it doesn't matter after post processing.

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
WillemVO
By WillemVO (Jan 4, 2012 at 12:17:45 GMT)

Try RAW and develop with Lightroom. That will change your opinion ! Success.

0 upvotes
Element42
By Element42 (Dec 18, 2011 at 23:10:16 GMT)

Dumb question to the other owners of this masterpiece ...
Is there any way to get RAW files when using the EXR mode or is that a contradiction it itself since the camera computes EXR output from "triangulating" the RAW data?
Thx for enlightening me.

0 upvotes
nakeddork
By nakeddork (Dec 22, 2011 at 05:29:44 GMT)

Nope, the x10 is optimized for jpeg...

0 upvotes
Scottelly
By Scottelly (Dec 16, 2011 at 19:02:02 GMT)

A little camera with a manual zooming lens, 1080p30, and a zooming rangefinder-style viewfinder? All this with Fuji's amazing sensor? Wow! I just wish the lens could be removed, so I could mount a wider zoom or a fisheye. It would be nice if it was APS-C and had a fold-out screen, like the NEX 7 also. You can't have everything, can you? It sure looks good. I can't believe this thing (and the NEX 7) can shoot so fast! The advantage here is that this thing has a zooming optical viewfinder and only costs $600.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/817840-REG/Fujifilm_16190089_X10_Digital_Camera_Black.html

1 upvote
ollie odonnell
By ollie odonnell (Dec 24, 2011 at 23:20:34 GMT)

witch ! (sic) is that thing u not on clear speak . x or nex

0 upvotes
victorw
By victorw (Dec 13, 2011 at 02:43:26 GMT)

have started to use a g12 for candid street photography. Blows me away with what it can do, but does have negatives of course.
The x10 sounds like a fantastic camera- if it suits your NEEDS go for it.
however my needs;
battery life ( i forget when i last charged it sometimes)
articulated screen ( no one sees me coming)

G12 wins handsdown for me as x10 seems not to have these strings to its bow
:)

0 upvotes
igocompact
By igocompact (Dec 17, 2011 at 00:31:40 GMT)

articulated screens are overrated
x 10 sensor is larger
manual zoom on the lens more natural method and a clear and much more precise viewfinder...I'll take the x10 every time..came close to buying the G12 but fuji's styling is just way too cool.

0 upvotes
nakeddork
By nakeddork (Dec 22, 2011 at 05:33:26 GMT)

I shoot with viewfinder, have the LCD in display mode, turned down to -4, and have the auto display turned off. The batter lasts for a long time.

I bought this camera to use as an advanced compact, and it does that well.

However, if you are gonna use it as a point-n-shoot, than yeah, the batter drains faster.

0 upvotes
Antone
By Antone (Dec 12, 2011 at 23:59:08 GMT)

The sensor is 2/3", as noted in the third paragraph above.

1 upvote
Peter 13
By Peter 13 (Dec 12, 2011 at 19:57:31 GMT)

DPReview, why do we have to use Google to find out the size of the sensor?

0 upvotes
pboehi
By pboehi (Dec 12, 2011 at 11:06:59 GMT)

I have been comparing images from the Fuji x10 with the Fuji x100 on the 500px.com site. Despite some nice images with bokeh and good conrtrast from the x10, this camera cannot touch the x100 or any other camera with a bigger sensor, so the dream to get top-notch quality in a small package remains unfulfilled - but this had to be expected, the law of physics are the way they are, and the x10 cannot overcome them either.

0 upvotes
Kozak Imre Oliver
By Kozak Imre Oliver (Dec 11, 2011 at 08:14:34 GMT)

Please, I'm waiting so much for your detailed review, hurry up!

3 upvotes
Bob Wenzlau
By Bob Wenzlau (Dec 8, 2011 at 22:21:26 GMT)

Is this an acceptable camera for HDR photography?

It appears that one needs to have the ability to program multiple exposure brackets. Can that be done on the camera? I expect to do the HDR processing with the downloaded images, and don't seek the camera to provide the processing, rather to accomplish adequate bracketing of images. Thanks

0 upvotes
stroboscopic
By stroboscopic (Dec 8, 2011 at 14:58:51 GMT)

"it also allows for shallower depth of field than most DSLRs when used with their kit zooms, when each are set to their respective telephoto ends."

That's not what the math says. The X10 should have about double the DoF in those conditions (compared to a 1.5x crop DSLR with a 55mm lens at f/5.6).

0 upvotes
sttp
By sttp (Dec 19, 2011 at 12:31:14 GMT)

Yeah - that's right. I've had one for about a month. No shallow DOF :( even with the lens wide open the focal length is too short.

0 upvotes
Dennis
By Dennis (Feb 21, 2012 at 10:33:51 GMT)

Someone mentioned that the X10 F2 is more like a SLR F8, so no shallow DoF. If you don't mind the "Pro Focus" (Advanced Mode) feature can fake some of the shallow DoF effect with multiple exposures - but it IS fake...

0 upvotes
sesopenko
By sesopenko (Dec 6, 2011 at 22:00:01 GMT)

Got mine on Saturday.

Likes: Saturation and contrast from the fujinon lens is great. The lens is a mechanical zoom. The viewfinder is enormous considering the size of the camera. The dedicated fn button programmed to change the iso by default is nice. The white balance button is nice. Decent hot shoe. Good build quality. The lens hood is metal. Fairly good jpeg engine.

Dislikes: no spirit level without live view. I figured out how to get the DOF indicator working once but haven't gotten it working since. The lens hood is sold separately for big $$. The lens hood has a 52mm thread DEEP inside it which is awkward. No ACR/Lightroom support at time of launch but that's to be expected. Haven't taken a photograph with texture resolved down to the pixel yet. More like 6MP of quality but that's comparing it to my 5D ;)

Once lightroom has RAW support I think this camera will sing. It has enthusiasts & photographers in mind and it's obvious when using it.

0 upvotes
Michael Jardine
By Michael Jardine (Dec 7, 2011 at 16:16:47 GMT)

I'd be interested to see some photos that show how it handles depth of field. For example, how is the bokeh on portraits stopped down to f/2?

0 upvotes
Shomari
By Shomari (Dec 2, 2011 at 19:26:14 GMT)

I like my X10 very much especially after reviewing Fuji-guys instructional video parts I, II &III on Youtube. These videos help me understand how the camera's features are acessesed and how they work.
Once you learn how to compensate for it's quirks you'll have fun. I love it for it's versatility, size and the images I am getting from the camera. I am using it as my "walk around, take everywhere with me" camera. I usually take landscape and still/art shots. Is it worth $600? Yes if you got it to spare. It was for me. Besides I draw too.
Many have recently posted that their camera exhibited " White Orb/Dot/Blob Syndrome or Specular Highlights in some their strongly lighted pictures. I have not experienced this phenomenon but I don't shoot towards the light very often. Anyway this is a wonderful camera IMHO.
REGARDS

2 upvotes
Kozak Imre Oliver
By Kozak Imre Oliver (Dec 11, 2011 at 08:26:09 GMT)

Youtube Fuji Guys X10 part 1:
http://youtu.be/cj25re-1UpM

0 upvotes
AbrasiveReducer
By AbrasiveReducer (Dec 2, 2011 at 18:24:05 GMT)

Very pleased with mine, so far. Yes, it's quirky but (and this is a very good sign) even set to full-auto, the results are clearly superior to LX3/LX5/XZ-1/GRD IV/S95. The X10 is decent at ISO 800 which I would not consider with any of the smaller cameras. The X10 is not as clean or as detail-rich as my DP1 but obviously it's far more flexible and no strange Foveon artifacts. I would have bought a X10 sooner but the marketing--about how stylish it was and how it made the prefect fashion acessory was really off-putting. Even "Made in Japan" is not necessarily an indicator of anything. I'm happy to report it's both attractive and, by the way, capable of producing excellent images.

1 upvote
sesopenko
By sesopenko (Dec 6, 2011 at 22:03:43 GMT)

I had a DP2 and I compared shots from my X10 down-sampled to about 4.5 MP to my DP2 shots I took before selling the DP2. Even downsampled to 6MP they looked just as sharp. Not bad considering it's a zoom vs a prime and the X10 has a faster lens than the DP1's.

Comment edited 44 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
OneGuy
By OneGuy (Nov 30, 2011 at 20:03:23 GMT)

I don't understand why FujiFilm quit working the F200EXR. There was so much excitement over the camera but all work stopped abruptly as if Fuji wanted to take the technology all the way and right-away to the $1k+ level (X100).

It just happened I wanted to get the F300EXR fully expecting the 200 follow-on. To my great dismay Fuji just dangled model numbers hoping for something I don't know what -- dumb consumers?

Now Fuji appears to work the EXR tech back down to X10 but I am rather cautious. I understand the guys getting excited over X10 and that's fine by me. I even like the X100 but would not buy one. I could say the color isn't right (and it isn't) or the corners are soft (and they are), but deep down I know I have difficulty trusting the Fuji people.

Cheers

0 upvotes
knurl
By knurl (Nov 30, 2011 at 09:13:47 GMT)

some anomalies in this camera :

longest shutter speed varies according to iso setting :
iso100 => up to 30" exposure
iso400 => max 8"
iso800 => max 4"
i have never before seen this in a camera. this is really a big dissapointment.
any logic in this? only thing i can think of is that the image probably becomes too noisy with longer exposures at the high iso settings.

i really liked the idea of "auto-max-iso" setting. lets camera choose iso, but user determines maximum value.
but consequence of this setting is that when shooting in P-modus it's no longer possible to scroll through the aperture/shutterspeed values. making this modus almost useless.

iso setting is not general. if you change it in M-modus, it doesn't change in any of the other modi. has to be changed everytime.
but then image size is general (except custom C-modi).
dynamic range setting is somewhere in between.
it's hard to get an overview of which settings change overall and which don't.

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 6 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
A Bull
By A Bull (Nov 29, 2011 at 21:02:25 GMT)

Please note the sensor in the X-10 is 2\3"
So 16.93333mm
Or bigger than the Nikon V system.

1 upvote
TTL35
By TTL35 (Nov 29, 2011 at 21:32:40 GMT)

Nikon 1 system is 1 inch, so it's bigger than 2/3 inch.. ;)

0 upvotes
igocompact
By igocompact (Nov 30, 2011 at 00:44:28 GMT)

not sure what specs you are looking at but nikon 1 is 13.2 mm just a bit larger then 1/2" not 1". all the same I'm not sure why nikon keeps popping up in this discussion. I think fuji is ahead of nikon when it comes to compacts with their innovative ideas and designs.

1 upvote
Leonard Migliore
By Leonard Migliore (Dec 5, 2011 at 02:29:14 GMT)

Inch-based sizes are strange. See the DP Review article about it. A 2/3" sensor is actually 8.8mm X 6.6mm, much smaller than the Nikon 1 sensor which is 13.2mm X 8.8mm.

0 upvotes
igocompact
By igocompact (Nov 29, 2011 at 04:15:43 GMT)

I have been using mine for the past 3 weeks...I love the feel and am very happy with the brightness of the lens...the zooming view finder is very nice feature and I have already become accustomed to the adjustment I must make for parallax etc. Love the menus and quality of both jpeg and raw have been very pleasing. I will start taking some high def video. And finally, this is just a small thing but I love the way this camera looks and it fits nice in the hands. what can i say but that so far I love this camera!

1 upvote
jeremybarton
By jeremybarton (Nov 28, 2011 at 18:22:25 GMT)

Finally i have the x10!!

1 upvote
Keith Aitken
By Keith Aitken (Nov 28, 2011 at 17:31:32 GMT)

RB - Thanks for this preview.
Will the X10 go beyond f/8 or is that the smallest aperture ?
Keith

0 upvotes
igocompact
By igocompact (Nov 29, 2011 at 03:51:18 GMT)

goes to f/11

1 upvote
emilmaga
By emilmaga (Nov 27, 2011 at 09:31:46 GMT)

DPR, you are very late with the review, no one will read it when it will come next year....ridiculous :(

5 upvotes
sesopenko
By sesopenko (Dec 6, 2011 at 22:07:55 GMT)

I suspect they're waiting for ACR support. Almost all their reviews compare ACR conversion to the camera's jpeg engine which is why I think their reviews are always delayed.

Honestly I think they're correct to wait. I have an X10 and it feels quite crippled without being able to shuttle raw files into lightroom. JPEGS always look like crap.

0 upvotes
danaceb
By danaceb (Nov 25, 2011 at 05:52:09 GMT)

"The High Resolution, 'HR' mode treats the sensor just as any other camera would - producing one output pixel per photosite. The EXR pattern isn't quite as good at capturing resolution as a Bayer sensor with the same pixel count though - the downside of clumping together pairs of similar colors is that the gaps between one pair and the next is much greater than the spacing between similarly-colored photosites in a Bayer sensor.

The degree to which this is an issue will depend on the sophistication of the image processing, which we'll see when we conduct a full review."

Good point, but I have yet to see an EXR camera actually suffer from this. The F200EXR had the greatest actual resolution of any small sensor P&S until the X10, and still is the greatest for pocketability. The Ricoh GR Digital IV and Canon S100 simply lack the clarity of the three(!) year old F200EXR in low iso landscape performance.

0 upvotes
bettablues
By bettablues (Nov 25, 2011 at 02:05:44 GMT)

Can't wait !

0 upvotes
jeremybarton
By jeremybarton (Nov 24, 2011 at 18:02:05 GMT)

Mine is finally in transit! cant wait!

0 upvotes
Nacho Man
By Nacho Man (Nov 24, 2011 at 13:53:11 GMT)

I would like to know about the X10's shutter lag, the bane of most of these point and shoot camera. The G11 is OK, still too slow, still a bit of delay when the shutter is pushed. You can pre-focus then keep your finger on the shutter lock button but that's an ackward fix at best. Any comments will be appreciated!

0 upvotes
sesopenko
By sesopenko (Dec 6, 2011 at 22:12:52 GMT)

When using the viewfinder and turning the screen off or setting it to info only my X10's shutter lag is virtually nil.

1 upvote
kombizz0
By kombizz0 (Nov 23, 2011 at 11:47:16 GMT)

It seems this new camera somehow better than Canon G12.
Looking forward to hold this babe very soon.

0 upvotes
danaceb
By danaceb (Nov 23, 2011 at 21:23:51 GMT)

I own it and can say its far superior to the canon G12 and all the premium compact irk, its really in its own league thats not been seen since the Leica Digilux 2 of 2003. It needs some further firmware tweaks, but it is exceptionally good and I'd smack anyone trying to call it an overpriced premium.

If you already have an APS-C or Full frame camera like I do, its the perfect set and forget camera to shoot jpegs that are distinctly superior to an S95 or XZ-1.

3 upvotes
RBARBA
By RBARBA (Nov 29, 2011 at 08:59:09 GMT)

I didn't get it....do you consider it as good as the S95 and XZ-1? Hey danaceb....Is there any particular reason for that? I am considering these three cameras...I am looking for the best trade-off for night shooting, colorful pics in daylight and "the smaller the better" in these precise order of importance. Since you own it, your comments are deeply appreciated.

0 upvotes
ThatOne
By ThatOne (Dec 5, 2011 at 23:29:43 GMT)

Buy the XZ-1 and be happy! Add the EVF; you won't be peering at just 85% of the scene and you will still have change...

0 upvotes
ama1
By ama1 (Nov 21, 2011 at 19:14:29 GMT)

Amazing build and picture quality with ton of features. The included software that captures photos to the computer has issues but I am sure Fuji will come up with fixes. Two thumbs up!

1 upvote
douglassalteri
By douglassalteri (Nov 19, 2011 at 09:05:14 GMT)

the quality I've been getting is better than the G12 or the GF-2, the menus are retty easy to fathom too.

::D

2 upvotes
Mike Paterson
By Mike Paterson (Nov 18, 2011 at 02:07:04 GMT)

isaacimages,
What HDR feature?
I've done a search in the X10's Manual for HDR and I can't find anything.

0 upvotes
healer81
By healer81 (Nov 19, 2011 at 05:30:46 GMT)

There is a setting in the camera that will allow you to take 3 shows in a row at different exposures.. I forgot whats it called.

0 upvotes
jmellas
By jmellas (Nov 21, 2011 at 00:39:23 GMT)

The feature is called HDR or High Dynamic Range. It allows for typically 3 images that are shot at different exposure values, to be combined into one, in order to attain, you guessed it, a higher dynamic range. Which in turn means the image will be darker in very bright areas and brighter in very dark areas.

0 upvotes
Luke_S
By Luke_S (Nov 26, 2011 at 22:33:00 GMT)

There is no such feature in X10.

0 upvotes
metalized
By metalized (Nov 27, 2011 at 08:57:42 GMT)

It is in EXR-DRange Priority mode that the HDR processing happens. When in this mode, a single shot will create 2 pictures at different exposures then combine them automatically to create a higher dynamic range picture (at half res.) This process is also happens when you choose P mode at half resolution.

0 upvotes
Guanajuato
By Guanajuato (Nov 29, 2011 at 23:09:55 GMT)

I believe there's also Dynamic Range bracketing in nearly all the other modes. Press the "Drive" button and the DR Bracket is the last on the list

0 upvotes
Total comments: 371
123