Why didn't pentax invent this first
|
| Forum | Pentax SLR Talk |
| Subject | Why didn't pentax invent this first [SIMILAR] |
| Posted by | MightyMike [PROFILE] |
| Date/Time | 06:30:11, 05 August 2008 (GMT) |
| |
|
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08080501microfourthirds.asp
now i'm not a fan of EVIL but its good for business and unless the rumored Pentax K1000D is supposed to work like this I don't think pentax really realizes the potential benefit of a micro DSLR body, my goodness imagine having a set of pancakes and a micro body, DA15mm F4ltd, DA21mm F3.2ltd, DA40mm F2.8 or FA43mm F1.9 and the DA70mm F2.4... not to mention the FA31 and FA77, DA35, FA35, FA50 and any other small lens... can you imagine a small bag with a small body and a set of small lenses for everyday shooting if you don't require a telephoto lens
--
Mike from Canada
'I like to think so far outside the box that it would require a telephoto lens just to see the box!' ~ 'My Quote :)'
http://www.michaelfastphotography.com/galleries/VP-BDI_3a.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?sort_order=views%20DESC&first_this_page=0&page_limit=180&&emailsearch=mighty_mike88%40hotmail.com&thumbnails=
Edited at 05/08/2008 05:33:12, 05/08/2008 (GMT) |
|
| Message | |
|  |
| Navigation | |< First < Previous |
|
Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view
other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll
through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next
newly posted message.
Shortcut keys:
fForum
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote
