End of a myth: IS/VR is not better than in body SR

User: Flat view
Navigation:   ^ Forum   |< First   < Previous   Next >   Next New >> 

Forum   Pentax SLR Talk
Subject   End of a myth: IS/VR is not better than in body SR  [SIMILAR]
Posted by   Rüdiger [PROFILE]
Date/Time   15:48:15, 18 July 2007 (GMT)

In the recent German FotoColor is a test of vibration reduction systems. The Sony A100, the Pentax K10D, the D80 with the 18-200VR and the 30D with 17-55IS were tested. The test was done with a shaker. A movement similar to camera shake was applyed with a frequency of 2 Hz and 4 Hz. The focal lenght was about 35 mm (equivalent), the time was 1/2sec and 1/4 sec. First a picture was done without shake, than with shake and shake reduction.
The sharpness of the reference picture was compared to the shaked camera with shake reduction. The resulting sharpness was still:
Pentax K10D--------85%
D80 + 18-200VR---78%
30D + 17-55IS------77%
Sony A100-----------51%
in comparison to the 100% of the unshaked camera.

Now, I would like to see the test also with 300 mm focal length, a focal length where I have the impression, that the K10D is even more efficient.
--
Regards
Rüdiger
Message  
Navigation  
|< First
< Previous

Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next newly posted message.

Subject Posted by When
Shortcut keys:
fForum
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote
Back to:  Forum: Pentax SLR Talk   Forums 
 
 
Copyright 1998-2008 Digital Photography Review, dpreview.com Ltd.