If money IS an object, 5D or 5D II?
|
| Forum | Canon EOS-1D / 1Ds / 5D |
| Subject | If money IS an object, 5D or 5D II? [SIMILAR] |
| Posted by | Nicholas Susatyo [PROFILE] |
| Date/Time | 11:42:28, 25 October 2009 (GMT) |
| |
|
Hiya fellas,
If you have used both 5D and 5D II, can you give me some help?
Simply, does 5D II produce -dramatically- better results than 5D? There are heaps of 2nd hand 5D out there and I'm thinking to change to full frame. My budget is pretty tight because I want to spend on lenses as well. Should I wait til I can get 5D II, or it's better off with original 5D?
Diffraction limited aperture (DLA) become my concern as well. I mainly shoot with small apertures for slow shutter landscapes. If you compare (with the same lens, focal length, etc), let's say, f/16 on both cameras, does 5D produce sharper/better result inasmuch as it has smaller DLA?
Any helps greatly appreciated in advance!
--
All the best!
Nick
|
|
| Message | |
|  |
| Navigation | |< First < Previous |
|
Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view
other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll
through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next
newly posted message.
Shortcut keys:
fForum
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote
