wanted to look at what i get from my systems sort of to evaluate whats it looking
like last year but didnt have time up till last week when i shot some Velvia 50
with f11 on an F 90 Nikon against a Hasselblad 500 CM (120) against a field camera with150 mm Nikon lens ( yes that existed) .
As digital cameras i used the D700 against the MF Hasselblad H3II 31MP
with Hc 2.8 80 and I also used a CF 60 mm from the old system on it.
All was on same sturdy Manfroto tripod with Cambo ball head.
used self timer or cable release. no wind !
weather was bad with low contrast light I chose that because its very demanding on the systems. all film was processed in the best lab in town and scanned with
a highend Imacon flextight scanner at highest possible physical resolution
and stored as tiffs.
The Digital files were raw files processed in Capture NX2 and Capture one or
Phocus for Hasselblad files
It was very difficult because of the not comparable focal lengths.
but for that purpose i both used a very sharp 60 mm micro nikkor old version
and on the Hasselblad both 80 mm which is a slight tele because of the not 120 size of the H3 so 60mm to 80 mm is a good comparison
i also looked at the cameras with both 60 mm focal lenght making the Hasselblad have double size.
note that the medium format film files are a crop from a larger area so the camera
and film combination would look a bit better at the same field size... !
next week i might get a D3x to look at also that 8 because I´m curious)
here are the clip files
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pkpictures01/sets/72157622523607863/

here are some sheets

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2543/4038291696_4f8634bfc3_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2625/4037543699_4394c07ced_o.jpg
Peter