Re: true wide-angle versus stiched panorama


|
| Forum | Open Talk |
| Subject | Re: true wide-angle versus stiched panorama [SIMILAR] |
| Posted by | Patrik Mächler [PROFILE] [GALLERY] |
| Date/Time | 10:46:22, 12 March 2006 (GMT) |
 |  |
 |
It depends what you like to capture. If you want to shoot building interiors, or close up people reportages, a wide angle is a good choice. If you like to make panoramic landscape shots, stitched panoramas are the way to go, me thinks. Why? With a wide angle lens, it is important for a good composition to have something interesting in the picture foreground, otherwise the result is mostly a dull picture, with a lot of empty foreground.
The picture below is made with 44mm focal length, so not even real wide angle, and it already lacks a interesting foreground. With a real wide angle lens, even more boring foreground and smaller buildings in the background would be the result.
http://www.pbase.com/pm/image/56868584/original.jpg
On the other side, with todays digital cameras, it is easy to create a wide landscape shot with a stitched panorama. When using a focal length on the tele side, the result is a more compressed and detailled view of the landscape.
The panorama below is done handheld, around 70mm focal length, 5 pictures stitched together automatic with 'Panorama Factory'.
http://www.pbase.com/pm/image/56863039/original.jpg
|
 |
| Message | |
|  |
| Navigation | |
|
Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view
other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll
through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next
newly posted message.

Shortcut keys:
fForum
1First message
pPrevious
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote