Re: 2 cents = worth at least a NICKLE

User: Flat view
Navigation:   ^ Forum   |< First   < Previous   Next >   Next New >> 

Forum   Pro Digital Talk
Subject   Re: 2 cents = worth at least a NICKLE  [SIMILAR]
Posted by   JoePhoto [PROFILE]
Date/Time   21:09:12, 22 January 2007 (GMT)


Bill Beebe wrote:
> I generally ask what their favorite feature is and what their least
> favorite feature is.
>
> I just did a portrait for a person that had about 20 moles on her
> face. When I asked about favorites, she said "can you do anything
> about moles? I hate them!" I then offered her 3 versions of the
> same image, 1st as is, 2nd completely removed of moles and the 3rd
> was a lightened version where you could still see them, but they
> were reduced.
>
> She ended up going with the just like her version.
>
> PS - if you are unclear about the response you get, I would wait
> until after the session to push the topic. Being too direct before
> the shoot could lead to the model thinking about it during the
> shoot. That could lead to less then optimal moods.

I agree completely ... don't do anything to change or challenge the "mood".

I used to own a one-hour photo-lab (and studio). I used to add a "diffuser" to my enlarger when I printed the photos. I had "3" levels ... (#1, #3, #5).

I used to use the #1 on men ... it was "barely" even noticable, but still had a subliminal softening effect. For most ladies ... I used a #3, it was "noticable" ... but they usually liked the results. But for "boudoir" I sometimes used the #5. It was very, very, very soft ... almost beyond recognition ... but the "effect" was great for it purpose.

BUT ... since it was done WHEN PRINTING, (same as you can do with PS); the effect is SELECTABLE by the client. So show them the difference, and let them make the choice.

HOWEVER ... something else I VERY OFTEN did ... I printed the photos with the negative BACKWARD. In other words ... the "proof" photos were REVERSED; (as SHE THINKS SHE LOOKS LIKE WHEN SHE SEE's HERSELF EVERY DAY IN THE ***MIRROR***).

In other words ... NO ONE knows what they really look like ... they have only seen "themselves" in a MIRROR. So a normal reaction when anyone sees their own photo is .... "That Just Does Not Look Like ME".

It is a "trick" ... do not tell them it is "reversed" ... but it gives them a chance to see themselves as they think they look.

I repeat ... AS THEY "THINK" THEY LOOK !!!

After I get their approval, or selections of their proofs ... I only then tell them what I did, and print the final photos correctly.

NOTE: I also did the same thing with my wedding albums ... the FIRST photos that I ALWAYS put into a their album is shots I have taken of them IN A MIRROR. So again ... those photos will be already "reversed" ... but it is what THEY THINK THEY LOOK LIKE since it is indeed how they have only seen themselves. So I shoot at least two shots in the mirror ... on maybe putting on lipstick ... and maybe one combing their hair .... and I make SURE those are the FIRST photos they see.

After they "love" those shots ... they are convinced I can-do-no-wrong ... (and am the greatest photographer in the entire world); so they automatically like the rest of the album.




> --
> -bill

--
Thanks for reading .... JoePhoto

( Do You Ever STOP to THINK --- and FORGET to START Again ??? )
Message  
Navigation  

Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next newly posted message.

Subject Posted by When
Shortcut keys:
fForum
1First message
pPrevious
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote
Back to:  Forum: Pro Digital Talk   Forums 
 
 
Copyright 1998-2008 Digital Photography Review, dpreview.com Ltd.