100fs or 200EXR It Seems Like There's a Clear Choice

User: Flat view
Navigation:   ^ Forum   |< First   < Previous   Next >   Next New >> 

Forum   Fujifilm Talk
Subject   100fs or 200EXR It Seems Like There's a Clear Choice  [SIMILAR]
Posted by   Erik Michael Nahman Stouffer [PROFILE]
Date/Time   08:07:45, 05 November 2009 (GMT)

Which do you think is better the 100fs or the EXR. The fs has 19 mp per centimeter which is a helluva lot better than the 25 mp in the EXR. Do you think that the improvements on the EXR are worth it? What are the improvements. Is the HR better? The picture quality is less. I've seen the 800 ISO and it sucks the 400 is good and I don't go higher than 400, and I like the fact that I think the 100fs maybe the 200 has 64 ISO. Whichever one that is I do like that it's tempting. I'm really tempted to see what you guys have to say. I'd love to see someone who has both that would be the coolest. I heard that you can take really great shots at half the resolution. Which I would do and then use some software to size up the quality. If you could recommend a product that does that. I don't have one, but I'd love to get one. Just recommend what you use.

Thanks.
--
Erik Stouffer
Message  
Navigation  
|< First
< Previous

Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next newly posted message.

Subject Posted by When
Shortcut keys:
fForum
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote
Back to:  Forum: Fujifilm Talk   Forums 
 
 
Copyright 1998-2008 Digital Photography Review, dpreview.com Ltd.