Re: Epson 1290 or Canon S9000? Which is better?
| User: | Flat view |
| Navigation: | ^ Forum | |< First | < Previous | Next > | Next New >> |
| Forum | Printers and Printing |
| Subject | Re: Epson 1290 or Canon S9000? Which is better? [SIMILAR] |
| Posted by | Joe Clemmons [PROFILE] [GALLERY] |
| Date/Time | 18:56:18, 24 October 2002 (GMT) |
I dont think you can get a prescription for that ;-) fotografer wrote: > Brendan, > > You must be new to this forum. > > There is a printer review recently and I can't remember the link, > but generally Epson 1290 use combined colour cart, that is all > colours are packaged into one cart, that means whenever one colour > first finishes (generally it's light magenta or light cyan) then > you have to replace the other 4 or 5 half-empty cart with it! This > is definitely not cost-effective. > > Canon s9000 uses individual carts, so you replace only those you > need to replace. From the calculations, Canon s9000, compared even > with the individual cart Epson 2200 (unlike Epson 1290, 2200 is > individual carts), Canon running cost is still lower, as reported > by the real users in this forum. > > Hope this helps. > > Be aware, two possible problems that *may* be associated with the > S9000. If you are unlucky, then your printhead may exhibit what is > known as banding (stripes of light and dark color 'lines' on solid > colour areas). The North American customers are given warranty to > the printheads, but I am not sure of the rest of the world, like > the UK, for instance. If not, you may have to buy a new printhead, > which will be extra hidden cost. And right now, since s9000 is > relatively new, you can't get printhead off the shelf until perhaps > another 6 months or so. But this is a big IF. There are plenty of > users out there without this problem. > > Another is prints that may gas fade under some circumstances. Since > you are comparing between 1290 and s9000, both are dye-based, and > 1290 is a successor to the ill-fated 1270, where there are > orange-shift problems in some places, just like what the some > (although again, this is small) present Canon s9000 users are > facing now. If you don't plan to sell your prints, or give them to > friends for keepsake, or use the right archival papers like Ilford > Galarie Classic series, then this problem, if ever, will be > minimised... > > BTW, I am not a Canonite, or Epsonite. I am, if you like, a HP-ite > (been using HP almost exclusively for 12 years now)... > > Brendan Harron wrote: > > I have £400 to spend on a printer which will give me photo-quality > > prints. After a lot of looking, I have whittled my choice down to > > two printers, the Canon S9000 and the Epson 1290. Which is better? > > All the reports that I have read seem to suggest that there's no > > real difference in output quality so I'm interrested in the cost of > > running each printer. Speed doesn't really matter very much. > > Can anyone give me the benefit of their experience? > > Thanx. > > -- > > Brendan H. > > -- > Fotografer | |
| Message | |
| Navigation | |
Below is the navigator for this thread, you can use this to view other messages in this thread. You can use the previous and next buttons to scroll through the messages in this thread. Or the 'Next New' button to jump to the next newly posted message.
| Subject | Posted by | When | |

Shortcut keys:
fForum
1First message
pPrevious
nNext
wNext new
rReply
qQuote
| Back to: | Forum: Printers and Printing | Forums |

